I’ll be the first the first person to put my hand up and say that I’ve
learnt something – perhaps something I’ve always known, and acted on, and yet
still refused to admit to myself. What exactly am I referring to? Well, this is
part of the problem; I don’t think it’s any one thing although it can be attributed
to one thing – white people in South Africa; more specifically, colonisation
and more recently Apartheid. The consequences of whiteness in South Africa, and
the lesson I’ve learnt there from, is that there is a so clearly obvious anger,
hatred, jealousy, and aggression held by the black people of South Africa. What
follows, will be my discussion on whether the aforementioned emotions are valid
or rightful and what part the white people living in South Africa today play in
either lessening or increasing these emotions.
The reason for this sudden awakening has been the simple observation
of what has transpired in South Africa over the last few months. Specifically,
incidents such as the thoughtless utterance from a now infamous blonde model
and the back and forth that continued afterwards over various online platforms
such as Twitter, forums and comments/discussions at the end of news reports.
Thereafter, the more recent “Zumaspear” debacle; a painting from Brett Murray
depicting ANC President Jacob Zuma looking suave with his penis for all to see –
and again, the intense back and forth that has followed and continues to
follow.
At first, I was offended. I was reading opinions from black people,
my fellow South Africans, with whom reconciliation had been affected. In and
around the 1990s, upon the symbolic release of Mandela, the rainbow nation was
born. All was forgiven and then was the time to begin afresh, start anew and
put the past behind us. However, sometimes a symbol is nothing more than that,
a symbol. It was in fact, a convenient reconciliation as can be noted by the
current showings of the Noble Peace Prize winner FW de Klerk – again, another
symbol of our reconciliation. Let it be noted here that I am not a pessimistic person
and in fact a highly optimistic one and perhaps it was my optimism that blinded
me. I was only 6 years old in 1994 and therefore, it was even easier for me to
accept that a true reconciliation was made – I saw pictures and videos of
Mandela and de Klerk holding each other’s arms up; I was taught (in my private
school) that we are now one nation – reconciliation had been made.
Why then, was I reading all these emotionally fuelled responses to
the two scenarios noted above and moreover, general opinions of blacks in South
Africa? Well, by now I hope you as the reader can draw the same conclusion that
I did – there never was reconciliation; there still hasn’t been. As a nation,
we are still very much divided – a de-saturated rainbow nation. This is because
white people (and perhaps in part, black people) were content with symbols such
as Mandela, deKlerk, the Truth & Reconciliation Commission, the Rugby World
Cup et cetera to be represent our reconciliation.
I believe that since 1994, South Africa has been in a honeymoon
period and since then; the cracks have started getting bigger, engulfing the
mere symbols of reconciliation that stood before and with that has exposed the
true, dire situation that the country is in. This is not to say that the facts
and figures of those living without food/water/education/houses were not enough
to make us see reality. The honeymoon is over and the married couple is no
longer happy; having rushed into things.
So, to answer the question; is black anger and the other various
emotions justified? Before this question is answered, I think we should first
consider the role that white people today play in relation to this black anger
and lack of reconciliation.
I was Mandela’s generation, I started school in 1994. However,
throughout my schooling and more importantly, to this day it is not compulsory
to learn an African language. Yes, there are 9 official African languages (in
line with reconciliation made) but why are children of today not learning a
language spoken by the overwhelmingly vast majority of our country; instead,
Afrikaans is chosen. To learn this ‘foreign’ language would put a lot of whites
outside their comfort zones and this needn’t be – especially after
reconciliation has been made. There has
been very little effort from white people in general to immerse themselves in
the culture that surrounds them because it’s easier not to. This comfort and
lack of action will simply lead to a ‘protection’ of the separation of people.
White people have made peace with Apartheid, reconciliation has
happened. This is no clearer than in the fact that white people do not
appreciate the fact that they are privileged. To an extent, we can all agree
that a lot of white people have earned everything they’ve worked for but, they’ve
had the opportunity to do so. We hear stories of European migrants coming to
South Africa with nothing by the clothes on their back and yes, it is admirable
that they made a life for themselves but we must consider that they had the
very essence of what was needed – an opportunity. Therefore, to say that one
race is ‘previously disadvantaged’ is to say that the other race is no longer
advantaged. Well, I had an advantage, while neither me nor my family participated
actively in Apartheid; we reaped the benefits, the privileges. The fact that my
grandfather and father were able to work hard for their money and the fact that
I was able to go to a private school is evidence enough of my privilege.
So, to answer my question, it would seem that black people do indeed
have reason to be angry. Not only was the reconciliation made nothing more than
symbolic but it seems that white people are more than content with this version
of reconciliation. Obviously, and fairly so, black people are not quite as
content with this faux of a reconciliation.
However, there is still a divergence of opinions. It appears that the
aforementioned basket of emotions has bred a new opinion. This opinion is that
there is an agenda amongst white people in South Africa that they are making a concerted
effort to keep the oppression of black people alive. Whilst, I might at very
most agree that the lack of effort on white peoples’ part is active in a way –
I can confidently say there is no secret ploy to expose black people for their ‘blackness’.
Perspective can be drawn from the ‘Zumaspear’ state of affairs. There were many
black people who cried out that Murray is just another white South African trying
to expose blacks for their blackness. Why couldn’t the perception be that
Murray is exposing a man who promised to act in the best interests of the poor;
a man representing the black liberation party – exposing the fact that Zuma isn’t
the norm of the black population or people in general but rather a parasite.
I don’t claim to be holier than thou or in any way righteous. I claim
to have reached a conclusion, a glaringly obvious conclusion – one that I have perhaps
known all along. Perhaps I am not alone in my hidden knowledge of the obvious.
If you don’t know by now, let your black friend tell you, reconciliation hasn’t
been affected – you are still privileged and until there are equal
opportunities you will remain privileged. This is however, not solely the fault
of the white man, although it does rest mostly upon his shoulders; the current
government has not been pulling their weight in improving equality in opportunities
in the broader sense of the term nor have they been affecting real
reconciliation - we can’t view this as
an attack on black people but rather, facts.
I do not think, however, that it’s not all grim. I know from
personal experience that there is a lot of love out there; there are people who
have made peace with each – as individuals. However, as a nation, we have a
long way to go but I believe that after this storm, the rainbow will indeed
show itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment